| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 21 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 30:15:44 |
| Calls: | 139 |
| Files: | 91 |
| Messages: | 42,708 |
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:23:59 -0000 (UTC) Adam H. Kerman
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
On 7/26/24 1:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP
will say he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a >>>>>bed at "Dr Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the >>>>>26th amendment for when a political party is too stupid to put >>>>>forth a legitimate candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt,
you illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are >>>>eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or >>>>abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article
by appropriate legislation.
Worst Amendment ever. :/
Teenage boys were drafted to be shot and killed in Viet Nam, in a
part of the world that held no important US interest. Yet they were
the ones who weren't mature enough to vote?
I remember lots of people scoffing over the Domino Theory, which said
that if Vietnam fell to the Communists, neighbouring countries would
soon fall too. Yet, as it happened, Laos and Cambodia fell on
virtually the SAME DAY as South Vietnam fell.
I don't think the Domino Theory was widely discussed by voters in the
early to mid '60s,
and it can be fairly pointed out that there was US
interference in those two countries.
I have no idea how Indochina became partitioned into so many
countries. I don't think that's the way the French administered it.
It's another example of what was wrong with the Treaty of Potsdam.
Indochina should have become a Trust Territory and not returned to the fucking French.
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:23:59 -0000 (UTC) Adam H. Kerman
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
On 7/26/24 1:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP
will say he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a >>>>>bed at "Dr Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the >>>>>26th amendment for when a political party is too stupid to put >>>>>forth a legitimate candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt,
you illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are >>>>eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or >>>>abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article
by appropriate legislation.
Worst Amendment ever. :/
Teenage boys were drafted to be shot and killed in Viet Nam, in a
part of the world that held no important US interest. Yet they were
the ones who weren't mature enough to vote?
I remember lots of people scoffing over the Domino Theory, which said
that if Vietnam fell to the Communists, neighbouring countries would
soon fall too. Yet, as it happened, Laos and Cambodia fell on
virtually the SAME DAY as South Vietnam fell.
I don't think the Domino Theory was widely discussed by voters in the
early to mid '60s, and it can be fairly pointed out that there was US interference in those two countries.
I have no idea how Indochina became partitioned into so many
countries. I don't think that's the way the French administered it.
It's another example of what was wrong with the Treaty of Potsdam.
Indochina should have become a Trust Territory and not returned to the fucking French.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will say
he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at "Dr
Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th amendment
for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a legitimate
candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will say
he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at "Dr
Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th amendment
for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a legitimate
candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you
illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation.
Not to mention that it will be up to the presidential electors at that
point, according to the 12th Amendment, which was passed after problems
with unanticipated political parties and elections of 1796 and 1800.
It's too late to substitute another nominee.
This got fixed a long time ago.
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will say
he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at "Dr
Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th amendment
for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a legitimate
candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Ian J. Ball <ijball@mac.invalid> wrote:
On 7/26/24 1:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will say >>>> he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at "Dr
Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th amendment
for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a legitimate
candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you
illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the
United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by
appropriate legislation.
Worst Amendment ever. :/
Teenage boys were drafted to be shot and killed in Viet Nam, in a part
of the world that held no important US interest. Yet they were the ones
who weren't mature enough to vote?
In article <v8d1vh$1hg08$5@dont-email.me>, gmsingh@email.com wrote:
On 7/30/2024 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2024 at 1:35:57 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>> On 7/26/24 3:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will say
he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at "Dr >>>>>>> Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th amendment
for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a legitimate >>>>>>> candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you >>>>>> illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen
years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the >>>>>> United States or by any State on account of age.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by >>>>>> appropriate legislation.
Duh, obviously I was phishing to see if I could get you to whine about >>>>> something, but then again I have heard you like being played like a fiddle.
The whole "I was just testing you" schtick that you pull whenever you get >>>> caught saying something exceptionally stupid, Hutt, is both transparent and
relentlessly puerile.
No one's falling for it.
FPP's desperate need for an "Internet win" seems to be contagious.
Thanks Pubie for admitting I got another internet win.
Looks like "trotsky" forgot whihc
On 8/2/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <v8d1vh$1hg08$5@dont-email.me>, gmsingh@email.com wrote:
On 7/30/2024 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2024 at 1:35:57 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 7/26/24 3:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will >>>>>>>> say he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at >>>>>>>> "Dr Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th >>>>>>>> amendment for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a >>>>>>>> legitimate candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you >>>>>>> illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are
eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age. >>>>>>>
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by >>>>>>> appropriate legislation.
Duh, obviously I was phishing to see if I could get you to whine about >>>>>> something, but then again I have heard you like being played like a >>>>>> fiddle.
The whole "I was just testing you" schtick that you pull whenever you >>>>> get caught saying something exceptionally stupid, Hutt, is both
transparent and relentlessly puerile.
No one's falling for it.
FPP's desperate need for an "Internet win" seems to be contagious.
Thanks Pubie for admitting I got another internet win.
Looks like "trotsky" forgot whihc account he's posting from again.
Well Pubie'd and anonyshitted.
gmsingh@email.com wrote:
On 8/2/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <v8d1vh$1hg08$5@dont-email.me>, gmsingh@email.com wrote:
On 7/30/2024 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
atropos@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2024 at 1:35:57 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/26/24 3:20 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
I predict Trump will have a stroke before November and the GOP will >>>>>>>>> say he's still their candidate even as he lies drooling in a bed at >>>>>>>>> "Dr Ronnie Johnson's" house. Then we'll have to create the 26th >>>>>>>>> amendment for when a political party is too stupid to put forth a >>>>>>>>> legitimate candidate.
The 26th Amendment has already been created and ratified, Hutt, you >>>>>>>> illiterate lump:
Amendment XXVI
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are >>>>>>>> eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or >>>>>>>> abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age. >>>>>>>>
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by >>>>>>>> appropriate legislation.
Duh, obviously I was phishing to see if I could get you to whine about >>>>>>> something, but then again I have heard you like being played like a >>>>>>> fiddle.
The whole "I was just testing you" schtick that you pull whenever you >>>>>> get caught saying something exceptionally stupid, Hutt, is both
transparent and relentlessly puerile.
No one's falling for it.
FPP's desperate need for an "Internet win" seems to be contagious.
Thanks Pubie for admitting I got another internet win.
Looks like "trotsky" forgot whihc account he's posting from again.
Well Pubie'd and anonyshitted.
Nonresponse noted, "trotsky".