• Re: Frankenstein

    From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Tue Aug 6 17:54:25 2024
    On 7/12/24 08:46, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:45:21 -0000 (UTC), Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

    In the Sopocles play, Oedipus has no desire to kill his father; in fact he's >> fleeing the area where he thinks his bio parents live to avoid that fate, when
    he *does* kill Laius (who he does not know is his father) in the first
    recorded incident of road rage.

    Nor does he know that Jocasta is his mother when he marries her, as a
    prize for getting rid of the Sphinx.

    This is because the point of the play is that "the gods" are cruel and remorseless. Oedipus is their victim, not a villain. This is, after
    all, /tragedy/, not crime drama.

    Robert Graves somewhere asserts that the winning plays (well, the
    tragedies) each year (and those we have were all winning plays, that
    is why they survived) were treated as /theology/. The Sophocles
    contribution to Greek pagan theology must have been very much a
    downer.

    Oedipus doesn't have any of the motivations described in Freud's 'Oedipus
    Complex'.

    IIRC, Freud asserted that the Oedipus myth was a /product/ of his
    complex, and so "proof" that it existed way-back-when.

    When I read the volume /Freud/ in the /Great Books of the Western
    World/ collection I formed the theory that his was a formal system: if
    you replaced "sex" with, say, "eating corn flakes with milk for
    breakfast", then nothing would change except that "sex" would become a sublimation of "eating corn flakes with milk for breakfast", as would everything said to be a sublimation of sex by Freud.

    IOW, I concluded that Freud's theory was founded on sex because Freud
    was obsessed by sex. And for no other reason.

    Well the patients he saw were sexual abused which because
    he was very concerned about societal acceptance in Vienna of the
    time he reported as the patients' fantasies



    But that's just me. And very much IMHO. Feel free to disagree.

    Freud himself, in /Civilization and Its Discontent/, asserted that all
    the problems he was investigating was a result of Western culture (ie, Victorianism). People not raised in that culture, including anyone
    below the upper middle class (which was good, as they could not
    possibly afford the fees), was free of them.

    The whole production, IOW, is a result of "high culture". Which rather
    raises the issue "how stupid do you have to be to adopt a 'high
    culture' that drives you and your children insane?".

    It would be hard to find a culture, high or low,
    which when it basic premises are extended far enough would
    not drive its victims mad.

    Well it was just a result of the Catholic religion and its peruliar views of sexuality. It was a state religion for the
    Austrian-Hungarian Empire which disitegrated after WW II. But it
    caused a lot of so-called religious wars in the time of
    the Protestan Reformation.
    SF connection is the "Ring of Fire' series.

    Have you watched the PBS series "Vienna Blood" which
    features the cooperation of a police detective with a Jewish
    Physician who is a follower of Fruedian discourse.

    I happen to think it is really excellent and it depicts
    the forces which will later bring the A-H Empire to an end and
    which still disturb the peace of the atates which were part of
    that Empire.

    bliss

    --
    b l i s s - S F 4 e v e r at D S L E x t r e m e dot com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)