• [Doctor Who] The Doctor Goes Rogue

    From The Last Doctor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 08:35:37 2024
    Spoilers, dear reader. Do not proceed until you have perused the latest
    chapter in the Doctor Who canon. You have been warned.
    “This is so Bridgerton”

    Well. If that doesn’t tell you that RTD needs to let more writers into his sandbox more often, nothing will. That was perfectly pitched, excellently paced, beautifully written modern Who - comedic, horrific, romantic and offbeat. It’s exactly what I was hoping for from the Gatwa era, and what I hadn’t seen until now.

    NOW, he’s the Doctor.

    “Bad Guy”

    There’s more than a hint of “greatest hits remix” about this story, though
    - which is a slight pity. If this had felt wholly original it would be a
    clear 10. It still knocks the rest of the series so far into a lower
    league.

    Captain Jack Harkness MK II - oops, sorry, I mean, hello, Rogue. Or is he
    Madam Pompadour MK II - the Doctor’s ill-fated love interest caught between costume drama history and science fiction?

    Shape shifting blood lusting aliens - the Chuldur - or The Family of Blood
    MK II?

    “Can’t Get You Out of My Head”

    As a sixty-something heterosexual brought up in the seventies, I have to
    say that the short-lived romance between Rogue and the Doctor was -
    beautifully and tastefully done. Great stuff. And I wouldn’t mind seeing Jonathan Groff again. The on screen chemistry between him and Gatwa was palpable.

    “Poker Face”

    Gotta get me some of that psychic jewellery. Much more discreet than Joe
    90’s bottle-glass specs! Fun twist, just when I thought we might also be revisiting “Face the Raven”.

    Overall, 9/10 - but wait.

    Who did we see in that scan? The 14 other numbered Doctors, War and the Fugitive … and one more. Richard E Grant, the Shalka Doctor. So … is he meant to be a second War Doctor? Are unbound Doctors leaking in from other dimensions in the jigsaw puzzle the Toymaker has made of the Doctor’s
    lives? Or if I rewatch Shalka, could there be a case for him coming before Hartnell? Intriguing.

    I would have really loved one more - but as David Warner is no longer with
    us, and he was only ever on Big Finish audio, I guess I can live with it.
    His Benny stories as the irascible, pragmatic “other Third Doctor” are sublime.

    (The rest of the unbound Doctors have been one-offs - two at a push - so
    less prominent.)

    And right there at the end of the titles - a memorial note for William
    Russell. In loving memory. So pleased he got to come back, one last time, a couple of years ago.

    OK. You win, dammit, RTD. 10/10. First episode of the season worth a
    rewatch, in my opinion.

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to mike@xenocyte.com on Sat Jun 8 15:45:00 2024
    In article <v4154p$2hnsg$2@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
    Spoilers, dear reader. Do not proceed until you have perused the latest >chapter in the Doctor Who canon. You have been warned.
    “This is so Bridgerton”

    Well. If that doesn’t tell you that RTD needs to let more writers into his >sandbox more often, nothing will. That was perfectly pitched, excellently >paced, beautifully written modern Who - comedic, horrific, romantic and >offbeat. It’s exactly what I was hoping for from the Gatwa era, and what I >hadn’t seen until now.

    NOW, he’s the Doctor.

    “Bad Guy”

    There’s more than a hint of “greatest hits remix” about this story, though
    - which is a slight pity. If this had felt wholly original it would be a >clear 10. It still knocks the rest of the series so far into a lower
    league.

    Captain Jack Harkness MK II - oops, sorry, I mean, hello, Rogue. Or is he >Madam Pompadour MK II - the Doctor’s ill-fated love interest caught between >costume drama history and science fiction?

    Shape shifting blood lusting aliens - the Chuldur - or The Family of Blood
    MK II?

    “Can’t Get You Out of My Head”

    As a sixty-something heterosexual brought up in the seventies, I have to
    say that the short-lived romance between Rogue and the Doctor was - >beautifully and tastefully done. Great stuff. And I wouldn’t mind seeing >Jonathan Groff again. The on screen chemistry between him and Gatwa was >palpable.

    “Poker Face”

    Gotta get me some of that psychic jewellery. Much more discreet than Joe >90’s bottle-glass specs! Fun twist, just when I thought we might also be >revisiting “Face the Raven”.

    Overall, 9/10 - but wait.

    Who did we see in that scan? The 14 other numbered Doctors, War and the >Fugitive … and one more. Richard E Grant, the Shalka Doctor. So … is he >meant to be a second War Doctor? Are unbound Doctors leaking in from other >dimensions in the jigsaw puzzle the Toymaker has made of the Doctor’s >lives? Or if I rewatch Shalka, could there be a case for him coming before >Hartnell? Intriguing.

    I would have really loved one more - but as David Warner is no longer with >us, and he was only ever on Big Finish audio, I guess I can live with it.
    His Benny stories as the irascible, pragmatic “other Third Doctor” are >sublime.

    (The rest of the unbound Doctors have been one-offs - two at a push - so
    less prominent.)

    And right there at the end of the titles - a memorial note for William >Russell. In loving memory. So pleased he got to come back, one last time, a >couple of years ago.

    OK. You win, dammit, RTD. 10/10. First episode of the season worth a
    rewatch, in my opinion.


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    United Kingdom save the NAtion on 4 July 2024 vote Liberal Democrat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Last Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Jun 8 19:14:39 2024
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    Bandwidth. For a couple of thousand text characters? In 2024? The mind
    boggles. In the chump change of Internet bandwidth these days, UseNet text traffic doesn’t amount to more than a wooden penny.

    As to Dave’s question about cross posting, I don’t like cross posting. And I was hoping the idiot wouldn’t feel the need to respond to each of my near-identical posts in three newsgroups, each of which has a differing readership. But I guess he probably did.

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sat Jun 8 18:23:53 2024
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to mike@xenocyte.com on Sat Jun 8 19:45:57 2024
    In article <v42aiv$2oqkr$1@dont-email.me>,
    The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    Bandwidth. For a couple of thousand text characters? In 2024? The mind >boggles. In the chump change of Internet bandwidth these days, UseNet text >traffic doesn’t amount to more than a wooden penny.

    As to Dave’s question about cross posting, I don’t like cross posting. And >I was hoping the idiot wouldn’t feel the need to respond to each of my >near-identical posts in three newsgroups, each of which has a differing >readership. But I guess he probably did.


    Now he gets it,

    --
    “Most of the Universe is knackered, babes.” - The Doctor


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    United Kingdom save the NAtion on 4 July 2024 vote Liberal Democrat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Jun 8 19:45:36 2024
    In article <xn0omu1us7it02l000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    Math is not your strong point, eh BS!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    United Kingdom save the NAtion on 4 July 2024 vote Liberal Democrat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Last Doctor on Sun Jun 9 15:36:18 2024
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    Bandwidth. For a couple of thousand text characters? In 2024?
    The mind boggles. In the chump change of Internet bandwidth
    these days, UseNet text traffic doesn’t amount to more than a
    wooden penny.

    Dave lives in the past. Because bandwidth might have been an
    issue for text newsgroups in the 1990's, he thinks it's the same
    today.

    As to Dave’s question about cross posting, I don’t like cross
    posting. And I was hoping the idiot wouldn’t feel the need to
    respond to each of my near-identical posts in three
    newsgroups, each of which has a differing readership. But I
    guess he probably did.

    Dave thinks cross-posting to six groups is the way to go... he's
    been on Usenet since 1991 and has learned nothing. Which kind of
    sums him up. Which is why he resides is so many people's
    killfiles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sun Jun 9 19:05:48 2024
    In article <xn0omvbzt8s9q77000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Last Doctor wrote:

    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:


    Can you not m ake one posts and crosst post it accordingly?

    What a waste of bandwitdh!

    What a waste of an education!

    Bandwidth. For a couple of thousand text characters? In 2024?
    The mind boggles. In the chump change of Internet bandwidth
    these days, UseNet text traffic doesn’t amount to more than a
    wooden penny.

    Dave lives in the past. Because bandwidth might have been an
    issue for text newsgroups in the 1990's, he thinks it's the same
    today.

    As to Dave’s question about cross posting, I don’t like cross
    posting. And I was hoping the idiot wouldn’t feel the need to
    respond to each of my near-identical posts in three
    newsgroups, each of which has a differing readership. But I
    guess he probably did.

    Dave thinks cross-posting to six groups is the way to go... he's
    been on Usenet since 1991 and has learned nothing. Which kind of
    sums him up. Which is why he resides is so many people's
    killfiles.

    You obviously never took economics in your life.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    United Kingdom save the NAtion on 4 July 2024 vote Liberal Democrat

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)